Convertio.com

VP9 vs H.264: Video Codec Quality & Size Compared

VP9 and H.264 are the two most widely used video codecs in the world. H.264 dominates device playback and social media uploads, while VP9 powers YouTube delivery and web video optimization. This guide compares quality, file size, encoding speed, and when to use each codec.

Convert MP4 to WebM

Re-encode from H.264 to VP9

MP4WebM

Tap to choose your file

or

Supports M4A, WAV, FLAC, OGG, AAC, WMA, AIFF, OPUS • Max 100 MB

Encrypted upload via HTTPS. Files auto-deleted within 2 hours.

What Are VP9 and H.264?

H.264 (also called AVC or MPEG-4 Part 10) is the most widely deployed video codec in history. Released in 2003 by the ITU/MPEG consortium, it powers everything from Blu-ray discs to YouTube uploads to smartphone cameras. It is the default codec inside MP4 containers.

VP9 is Google's open-source video codec, released in 2013 as the successor to VP8. It was designed to match H.265/HEVC quality while remaining completely royalty-free. YouTube re-encodes all uploaded videos to VP9 for delivery, and VP9 is the primary codec inside WebM containers.

Quality Comparison

At equivalent visual quality (measured by SSIM or VMAF metrics), VP9 achieves 30–50% smaller file sizes than H.264. The improvement is most noticeable at lower bitrates, where VP9 maintains sharper detail and fewer artifacts.

The CRF (Constant Rate Factor) equivalence between the two codecs:

H.264 CRFVP9 CRF (equivalent)Quality Level
1820–25Visually lossless
2330–33Default / excellent
2835–40Good / smaller files

Encoding Speed

VP9 is significantly slower to encode than H.264 — typically 10–20x slower at default settings. This is the major tradeoff for its superior compression.

The cpu-used parameter controls the speed/quality tradeoff for VP9:

cpu-usedSpeedQuality Impact
0Extremely slowBest compression
1–2Very slowMinimal loss
3Moderate (our setting)~5% less efficient
4–5FastNoticeable loss
6–8Very fastSignificant loss

Our converter uses cpu-used 3 with row-mt 1 (row-based multithreading) for an acceptable balance of speed and quality in an online conversion service.

File Size Comparison

Real-world example with a 1-minute 1080p clip at equivalent visual quality:

CodecSettingsFile SizeSavings
H.264CRF 23, medium preset~10 MBBaseline
VP9CRF 30, cpu-used 3~6 MB~40% smaller

Browser & Hardware Support

Both codecs have excellent support in 2026:

  • H.264: universally hardware-decoded on every device manufactured in the last 15 years. Every browser, every phone, every TV, every gaming console.
  • VP9: decoded natively in Chrome, Firefox, Edge, and Safari 16.6+. Hardware acceleration on most modern GPUs (Intel Gen 7+, NVIDIA Maxwell+, Apple M1+).

Licensing & Cost

  • VP9: completely royalty-free under the WebM Project license. No licensing fees ever.
  • H.264: requires MPEG-LA licensing. The costs are typically covered by device and software manufacturers, so end users do not pay directly.

Which Should You Choose?

Use CaseRecommendationWhy
Web delivery (bandwidth matters)VP9/WebM30–50% smaller files
Universal device playbackH.264/MP4Works on everything
YouTube uploadEitherYouTube re-encodes to VP9 anyway
Social media uploadH.264/MP4Required by most platforms
Royalty-free requirementVP9/WebMNo licensing fees
Real-time encodingH.26410–20x faster encoding

Try VP9 Encoding

Convert your MP4 to WebM and compare file sizes

MP4WebM

Tap to choose your file

or

Supports M4A, WAV, FLAC, OGG, AAC, WMA, AIFF, OPUS • Max 100 MB

Frequently Asked Questions

VP9 produces 30–50% smaller files at the same visual quality, and it is royalty-free. However, H.264 encodes much faster and has broader hardware support. VP9 is better for delivery; H.264 is better for real-time encoding.

YouTube transcodes all uploads to VP9 for delivery on most devices. H.264 is used as a fallback for older devices. Premium content may also use AV1.

VP9's encoding complexity is the tradeoff for its superior compression efficiency. Using cpu-used 3 or higher and row-mt 1 (multithreading) significantly speeds up encoding while retaining most of the quality advantage.

VP9 CRF 30 is a good default (equivalent to H.264 CRF 23). For higher quality, use CRF 20–25. For smaller files, use CRF 35–40. Values below 15 provide diminishing returns.

More MP4 to WebM Guides

What Is WebM? Google's Open Video Format Explained
WebM format explained: VP8, VP9, AV1 codecs, Opus audio, browser support, advantages, and limitations.
WebM vs MP4: Which Video Format for Web?
WebM vs MP4 compared: VP9 vs H.264, file size, quality, browser support, licensing. When to use each format.
Why WebM Is Better for Websites: Developer Guide
WebM delivers 30-50% smaller video for websites. HTML5 fallback pattern, Core Web Vitals impact, VP9 settings.
VP9 Encoding Settings: Complete FFmpeg Guide
Master VP9 encoding: CRF values, cpu-used speed, row-mt, Opus audio, two-pass mode. Our converter settings explained.
Back to MP4 to WebM Converter